 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| more news |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| A TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH SERVICE |
 |
|
| A CABLE/MSO SECTOR RESEARCH SERVICE |
 |
|
| A SILICON & SUBSYSTEM RESEARCH SERVICE |
 |
|
| A BUSINESS-CLASS VOICE APPLICATIONS RESEARCH SERVICE |
 |
|
| A SERVICE DELIVERY RESEARCH SERVICE |
 |
|
| A WIRELESS INFRASTRUCTURE RESEARCH SERVICE |
 |
|
| REAL WORLD RESEARCH |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Fibre Channel Over Ethernet: Extending FC Into the Future |
 |
The Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE) protocol may still be in the early stages of development, but its potential to consolidate separate storage and data networks into a single unified architecture within the data center has generated a lot of interest.
Most data centers today use two or three separate networks: An Ethernet LAN connects servers with each other and the outside world, and a storage area network (SAN) – in the vast majority of cases based on Fibre Channel (FC) – connects the same servers with a range of storage devices. In some cases, the same facility will also use another interconnect fabric (usually InfiniBand) specifically for clustered servers in high-performance computing (HPC) environments.
FCoE is designed to merge at least two of those separate networks by allowing native FC data traffic to be carried unaltered across a 10-Gbit/s Ethernet network. Previous attempts to persuade IT managers to run block-based storage traffic over standard Ethernet networks have failed for a number of reasons, but largely because of ongoing concerns that the reliability and bandwidth of 1-Gbit/s Ethernet was not up to the job. But if FCoE can solve those problems and deliver on its promises, it can yield significant consolidation and management benefits.
Fibre Channel Over Ethernet: Extending FC Into the Future explains what FCoE is, how it works, what its benefits are, and how vendors are likely to implement the protocol into new and existing storage technologies. It also attempts to compare the advantages of using FCoE against other non-FC storage technologies, specifically Internet Small Computer Systems Interface (iSCSI) and InfiniBand, and explains where FCoE is likely to make inroads against them.
This report provides critical data and analysis for a range of industry participants, including:
 |
 |
 |
Storage technology suppliers needing a deeper understanding of FCoE's potential as a challenger to iSCSI and InfiniBand |
 |
 |
 |
SAN operators and enterprises seeking a clear, independent analysis of FCoE's costs and benefits for upgrading infrastructure |
 |
 |
 |
Investors needing a better understanding of the scale of the opportunity FCoE presents |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Sample research data from the report is shown in the excerpts below: |
 |
Table of Contents (bsi0208_toc.pdf) |
 |
FCoE can be deployed in a variety of topologies, either as an addition to existing storage and data infrastructure, or as the basis of a completely new network in greenfield sites. Given most storage managers' preference not to completely scrap legacy equipment, the most common scenario is likely to see FCoE consolidating traffic in the network's access layer, with FCoE converged network adapter (CNA) installed in the servers and passing FC packets to the SAN and Ethernet packets to the LAN via FCoE-enabled switches. |
 |
 |
 |
| [click on the image above for the full excerpt] |
 |
FCoE is intended primarily as a way to unify FC and Ethernet networks, but it may also have an impact on other technologies being used in enterprise SANs and data centers. |
 |
 |
 |
| [click on the image above for the full excerpt] |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
Companies profiled in this report include: Brocade Communications Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: BRCDD); Cisco Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CSCO); EMC Corp. (NYSE: EMC); Emulex Corp. (NYSE: ELX); Finisar Corp. (Nasdaq: FNSR); Intel Corp. (Nasdaq: INTC); LSI Corp. (NYSE: LSI); Network Appliance Inc. (Nasdaq: NTAP); Nuova Systems, Inc.; and QLogic Corp. (Nasdaq: QLGC). |
 |
Other companies mentioned in this report include: Broadcom Corp. (Nasdaq: BRCM); Hewlett-Packard Co. (NYSE: HPQ); IBM Corp. (NYSE: IBM); Fujitsu Ltd. (OTC: FJTSY); Mellanox Technologies Inc.; NeoScale Systems Inc.; PMC-Sierra Inc. (Nasdaq: PMCS); Sun Microsystems Inc. (Nasdaq: SUNW); Teak Technologies Inc.; Vitesse Semiconductor Corp. (Pink Sheets: VTSS); and VMware Inc. (NYSE:VMW). |
 |
Total Pages: 18 |
 |
   |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| "Provides content and insights not found within alternate sources. I look forward to each installment." |
| - Anne-Marie Johnson, Market Research Manager, CNT |
 |
| "Looks very good; great content, too." |
| - Ted Uhler, Product Manager, Dot Hill Systems Corp. |
 |
|
 |
|